About Me

Name: Dr Michael Williams
Email: drmike@drmichaelwilliams.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

If it walks like a duck...or a Marxist

Albuquerque, NM (Wisdom4Today) I know people may be wondering why I keep refering to marxists in my posts and position as a leader of a Christian organization. Simply stated, what Nazism was to the Jewish people, Marxism is to the world. Marxism is a godless religion (yes I said religion) that elevates the state or motherland to the level of God and executes a demonic holocaust upon humanity. A foundational principle of communism is the elimination of any reference by the people to believe and worship God in a manner that is not approved by the state. Marxist indoctrination methods employed by its practitioners notoriously included extensive "retraining" to remove the person's belief in God and elimination of worship, reading the Bible, etc..
 
Why is this an issue to discuss? Because we are now seeing on almost a monthly basis how officials that have recently been placed in the highest levels of government that are self proclaimed marxists; who extoll the virtues of Marxism; and those leaders who practice the same. We are seeing the systematic dismantling of capitalism using whatever guise avalailable and a coordinated effort to implement marxist practices. I am not going to document the list of names here because there are other organizations that that are revealing the evidence along with the names.
 
However, there is a question that has to be asked that somehow not many want to ask nor does anyone want to answer. The question is when you see people and policies in the highest levels of government expousing Marxist ideology; refering to Marxist leaders as objects of admiration; and political appointees to positions that interact with specific demographics of which they offend with their personal views, why isn't anyone asking why? Why would someone be appointed to deal with violence in schools that is friendly to groups that want the legalization of sex with little boys? Why would someone be appointed to interact with religious organizations that is an outspoken opponent of religious organizations? Why would someone who interacts with the media bragg about how their practices are used to control the media? Why would numerous key advisors and "Czars" that are self proclaim marxists who want a revolution to "transform America" even get security passes to VISIT the White House, much less WORK in the White House?
 
As it was once said about taxes, that if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's a duck. Likewise, if it walks like marxism and talks like marxism it must be a marxism. It seems to me that our elected officials in Washington need to be taken to the woodshed and given a lesson about Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution:
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
 
I would hope that our elected officials would show more respect and admiration for our Constitution than the marxist tyrants who were and still are responsible for tens of millions of deaths in the last century. Likewise they should be grateful that in a Republic, when we need to remove someone from power, we do not take them out and shoot them in the head like so many of those that they admire have done. Instead, we take them out at the ballot box.
 
For me, this is not a political issue. If it were, my focus would be to solely to take the advice of the Lord and render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's. But, my focus is on whether we should listen to what God says to do or what man says to do. So my focus is to take the the whole counsel of the Lord and render unto God the things of God. In other words, politial issues can be left to those who like to deal with political issues, but when political issues become God's issues, that is where I have to draw the line and do what Good tells me to do through His Word. Hopefully, many others who call them self "conservatives" will stop looking to man's definition of conservative and start looking to God's definition of a conservative. If we could do that, our nation would be a whole lot better off.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Danger of Liberalism

Jefferson, OH (Wisdom4Today) Our nation has changed dramatically since her founding and this election cycle promises even more change. Unfortunately, the change that is promised by liberalism is nothing new. It has been tried before and the results have proven be to disastrous. Out founders foresaw this age knew this when they wrote our constitution because they knew how power has the ability to corrupt when it is in the hands of a small group of people. This is why they addressed this in Article 4, Section 4 of the US Constitution:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."(Emphasis mine) Source: http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/constitution/

What modern day liberalism is proposing is nothing less than an overthrow of the US Constitution. Sadly, if more people actually read the Constitution instead of listening to Marxists who tell them what the Constitution means, we would be a whole lot better off. Jesus, when tempted to ignore government mandates to pay taxes, said: "Show me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesar's. And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's." (Luke 20:24-25) The problem with liberalism is that it is not satisfied with the "things which be Caesar's"; they also want the "things which are God's." By this I mean that when government centralizes power and financial resources away from the control of the people, then churches suffer in their ability to provide for the needs of the truly needy.

Many church members admit that they are financially strapped and would like to do more to support the church in ministering to those whom are in need. At the same time, it disgusts them to see the money that is wasted by the federal government on programs that are abused through fraud. The sad part is that many fine people donate their time and efforts to ministering to others, but are severely hampered by lack of funds. If you examine the basis of focus of liberalism, you will find the following:

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. (IN OTHER WORDS, LOSS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (IN OTHER WORDS, A PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM)

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. (IN OTHER WORDS, A DEATH TAX)

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. (IN OTHER WORDS, SEIZING OF LAND THROUGH IMMINENT DOMAIN BEYOND PUBLIC WORKS)

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. (DO I EVEN NEED TO POINT THIS ONE OUT? HINT: 700 BILLION DOLLARS)

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state. (IN OTHER WORDS, THE FCC and "FAIRNESS" DOCTRINE)

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state. (IN OTHER WORDS, GOVERNMENT BUYOUTS OF BUSINESS AND GIVING LABOR UNIONS POWER OVER THE BUSINESS OWNERS); the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan (IN OTHER WORDS, FARM SUBSIDIES AND AGRICULTURAL COMMERCE REGULATION).

8. Equal obligation of all to work. (IN OTHER WORDS, TO PAY TAXES AND DISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH) Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. (UNDOCUMENTED MIGRANT WORKERS DRIVING DOWN THE WAGES FOR LEGAL MIGRANT AND NON-MIGRANT WORKERS)

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. (IN OTHER WORDS, SPREADING THE WEALTH AROUND THROUGH CENTRALIZED FEDERAL POWER TO TAX PROGRESSIVELY)

10. Free education for all children in public schools. (IN OTHER WORDS, BUT NOT IN NON-GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS) Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. (OKAY, I ADMIT, THIS ONE IS NOT BAD) Combination of education with industrial production, etc. (IN OTHER WORDS CREATING A "RIGHT" TO HIGHER EDUCATION)


Some may disagree with my interpretation of "in other words", but before you criticize my assessment of these points, first ask yourself who came up with these "progressive" ideas. Your answer can be found in the Communist Manifesto written by none other than Karl Marx. You can read it yourself at http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html . When you are done reading ask yourself why would those who subscribe to liberalism would put forth an agenda that Karl Marx proposed for the overthrow of Democracy and Capitalism? Then ask yourself if Communism has a history of preserving the rights of the people to be self governing? When you are done, explain to those of us who believe that the founders had it right by writing Article 4, Section 4, how your version of "change" is not dangerous and going to lead to the betterment of us all.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »