About Me

Name: Dr Michael Williams
Email: drmike@drmichaelwilliams.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Karl Marx must be looking up and smiling

Akron, OH (Wisdom4Today) With not even 100 days passed since the election, Americans are waking to a different America than they knew before the election. Not since the Summer of 1776 have we seen such drastic changes in the role of government in America. Simply stated, we are experiencing nothing short of an Americanized 21st century remake of the Russian revolution. What started out as a mantra for change has evolved into a full scale coup d'etat on every aspect and segment of America. What started out as a vision of hope for the future has evolved into a sense of hopelessness that has everyone wondering if there will be a future.
 
To demonstrate how this nationalized anxiety is manifesting itself, one need not look any farther than your local business community. Just since the election, I have received three reports of individuals who were out of work and were being considered for high paying management or highly skilled technology positions. In each case, the potential employers, all well established and known companies that were weathering the economic downturn, were in the final stages of offering a position to an individual after weeks of negotiations and interviews. In each of the cases the companies contacted the individuals to inform them that they were going to have to retract their offers of employment. The reason given in each case is that given statements and actions by the President and Congress, they were suspending hiring any new employees until they knew what was going to happen with the federal government and how it was going to impact businesses and the economy. While apologizing profusely, they added that they believed that the changes occuring in Washington were going to make it harder to successfully conduct business.
 
Considering this, as well as other reactions in the business community, it is no wonder that the only businesses that are hiring are in health care and government. With the kind of power that the federal government is wielding, it is no wonder that even the French Socialists are concerned about what America is becoming. It makes one wonder if Karl Marx is looking up from his place of torment and a momentary smile is flashing across his face seeing his dream for the world being quickly put into place.
 
Just as the implentation of Marxism caused a revolution in Russia, it is becoming very apparent by the increase in "Tea Parties" through out America that it is only a matter of time before a revolution is sparked in America. Only this time, the revolution will not be to implement Marxism, it will be the rising of a free people who reject losing their independence in the name of change. Reagan once said, "How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-communist? It's spomeone who understands Marx and Lenin." The American people inderstand Marx and Lenin and they will not allow themsleves to be put in bondage without a fight. When the time comes to fight this tyranny on our own soil, other words of Reagan will also ring true: "Above all, we must realize that no arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women." No matter what anyone says, freedom is a powerfull motivator because it is a gift from God and makes live worth living.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Danger of Liberalism

Jefferson, OH (Wisdom4Today) Our nation has changed dramatically since her founding and this election cycle promises even more change. Unfortunately, the change that is promised by liberalism is nothing new. It has been tried before and the results have proven be to disastrous. Out founders foresaw this age knew this when they wrote our constitution because they knew how power has the ability to corrupt when it is in the hands of a small group of people. This is why they addressed this in Article 4, Section 4 of the US Constitution:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."(Emphasis mine) Source: http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/constitution/

What modern day liberalism is proposing is nothing less than an overthrow of the US Constitution. Sadly, if more people actually read the Constitution instead of listening to Marxists who tell them what the Constitution means, we would be a whole lot better off. Jesus, when tempted to ignore government mandates to pay taxes, said: "Show me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesar's. And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's." (Luke 20:24-25) The problem with liberalism is that it is not satisfied with the "things which be Caesar's"; they also want the "things which are God's." By this I mean that when government centralizes power and financial resources away from the control of the people, then churches suffer in their ability to provide for the needs of the truly needy.

Many church members admit that they are financially strapped and would like to do more to support the church in ministering to those whom are in need. At the same time, it disgusts them to see the money that is wasted by the federal government on programs that are abused through fraud. The sad part is that many fine people donate their time and efforts to ministering to others, but are severely hampered by lack of funds. If you examine the basis of focus of liberalism, you will find the following:

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. (IN OTHER WORDS, LOSS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (IN OTHER WORDS, A PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM)

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. (IN OTHER WORDS, A DEATH TAX)

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. (IN OTHER WORDS, SEIZING OF LAND THROUGH IMMINENT DOMAIN BEYOND PUBLIC WORKS)

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. (DO I EVEN NEED TO POINT THIS ONE OUT? HINT: 700 BILLION DOLLARS)

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state. (IN OTHER WORDS, THE FCC and "FAIRNESS" DOCTRINE)

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state. (IN OTHER WORDS, GOVERNMENT BUYOUTS OF BUSINESS AND GIVING LABOR UNIONS POWER OVER THE BUSINESS OWNERS); the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan (IN OTHER WORDS, FARM SUBSIDIES AND AGRICULTURAL COMMERCE REGULATION).

8. Equal obligation of all to work. (IN OTHER WORDS, TO PAY TAXES AND DISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH) Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. (UNDOCUMENTED MIGRANT WORKERS DRIVING DOWN THE WAGES FOR LEGAL MIGRANT AND NON-MIGRANT WORKERS)

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. (IN OTHER WORDS, SPREADING THE WEALTH AROUND THROUGH CENTRALIZED FEDERAL POWER TO TAX PROGRESSIVELY)

10. Free education for all children in public schools. (IN OTHER WORDS, BUT NOT IN NON-GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS) Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. (OKAY, I ADMIT, THIS ONE IS NOT BAD) Combination of education with industrial production, etc. (IN OTHER WORDS CREATING A "RIGHT" TO HIGHER EDUCATION)


Some may disagree with my interpretation of "in other words", but before you criticize my assessment of these points, first ask yourself who came up with these "progressive" ideas. Your answer can be found in the Communist Manifesto written by none other than Karl Marx. You can read it yourself at http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html . When you are done reading ask yourself why would those who subscribe to liberalism would put forth an agenda that Karl Marx proposed for the overthrow of Democracy and Capitalism? Then ask yourself if Communism has a history of preserving the rights of the people to be self governing? When you are done, explain to those of us who believe that the founders had it right by writing Article 4, Section 4, how your version of "change" is not dangerous and going to lead to the betterment of us all.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »